Why Migrate to Node.js?
Browser WebCodecs is perfect for client-side video processing, but server-side encoding unlocks:Privacy & Security
Process sensitive videos server-side without client uploads
Computational Power
Use dedicated hardware encoders (NVENC, VideoToolbox, QuickSync)
Batch Processing
Process thousands of videos in parallel worker threads
Isomorphic Code
Share effects code between browser preview and server export
API Compatibility
node-webcodecs implements 100% of the browser WebCodecs API. Code that works in Chrome/Firefox/Safari works in Node.js without changes.- Browser
- Node.js
Key Differences
While the WebCodecs API is identical, the runtime environment differs:1. No Canvas API (Use node-canvas)
- Browser
- Node.js
2. Worker Threads (Use useWorkerThread option)
- Browser
- Node.js
3. Hardware Acceleration
- Browser
- Node.js
4. File System Access
- Browser
- Node.js
Isomorphic Code Patterns
Write code that works in both browser and Node.js:Pattern 1: Shared Effects Module
Pattern 2: Platform-Specific Factories
Pattern 3: Frame Source Abstraction
Migration Checklist
Real-World Example: Isomorphic Video Editor
Here’s a complete example of an effects system that works in both environments:Performance Comparison
- Browser
- Node.js
Browser Strengths:
- Zero installation (runs in any modern browser)
- Direct access to
<video>,<canvas>, WebCam - Automatic hardware acceleration
- Low latency for preview
- Limited to user’s device hardware
- No batch processing
- Privacy concerns (upload required for server processing)
- Tab backgrounding throttles encoding